Main

June 12, 2007

Wink Causes Privacy Concerns

Although I found the general functionality of the site irrelevant, I have begun to use the flash badge provided by Wink to advertise the various sites I am on in my tumblr (and now on my blog). I figured that some friends may find this useful or interesting so i decided to send invitations to a few people. Imagine my surprise to find out that one of my friends, who I can vouch never joins an online service unless invited by me, was already a member. Considering that she was sitting right next to me at the time, I inquired as to how she had found Wink, to which she replied that she has never heard of it and certainly never signed up for it. I believe her. A quick search through her email showed no invites (that I may have mistakenly sent at 4am and not remembered) and no welcome emails. Not only is she listed as a member of the site, but her myspace profile address, myspace name and her location have been added to her Wink profile. I did a quick search for some other friends' names who I know are on myspace and found that most of them came up, although they were not explicitly listed as actual members.

Wink advertises themselves as a people search engine so I can only assume that their response to her angry email will be something along the lines of the right to pull information from anywhere search-engine style. But listing her as a member of a site she never signed up for is crossing the line a bit. Hopefully, it is some kind of oversight on their behalf. I also must admit that given the nature, look and feel of Wink, it does seem somewhat icky to find yourself profiled on there if you never signed up (particularly when your myspace page is the only information displayed about you). Not cool!! If you have a myspace profile, go search yourself, guaranteed you'll find something.

February 09, 2007

Live Online

In the Urban Computing class last night, Kevin Slavin showed us a website that I had not seen before. Stickam.com is like Myspace with a twist, its users broadcast themselves from their webcams live online. For about twenty minutes last night we watched an 18 year old boy from Orlando, Florida laying on his bed looking at his webcam, and presumably chatting on his computer with someone. He said nothing and did nothing. It was incredibly strange and, given its voyeuristic overtones, pretty boring. I searched through the site a little after class and the interesting thing is, this kind of behavior really does seem to be the norm. Most of the Stickam users are not actually doing or saying anything so, in actual fact, the web camera is not broadcasting their lives at all, but rather providing a kind of window into their bedrooms. Kevin made the every interesting point last night that this kind of virtual structure is actually mimicking that of the urban experience. In a city, he reasoned, we come into contact with strangers all of the time, and are constantly engaging in some sort of accidental and purposeful performance through our choices in clothing, behavior, where we choose to go etc. He also made the point that these kids are actually in some way searching for the kind of missing feeling that exists when one does not have this urban experience, and that in fact this is perhaps what we are all searching for when making our selves public in an online space, some form of connection and companionship with strangers.

I thought this point was incredibly interesting, but I have not yet figured out how much I buy the entire concept. It is certainly true that companionship with strangers is something unavoidable in a city environment such as New York. I was struck by how much I personally had incorporated this kind of feeling into my daily existence when I moved to LA, a city where feeling as though you are part of a crowd of strangers is almost impossible.. Every one drives, no one walks the streets and the accidental meeting between people who don't know each other is rare and confined to particular parts of the city at particular times. But New York is also anonymous and, as I have begun to realize more and more, the tendency for most people in this city is to keep a wall of personal space around oneself while engaging in physical contact with crowds. When we are on the subway, we look down or we read. When we walk the streets we are on our mobile phones or listening to our ipods. Its not that we are not engaging at all, but we have adapted to the public environment of crowds by developing different concepts of personal space. These spaces do get violated, people talk to us that we don't know, watch us, sometimes acknowledging that fact (how many women have been hollered at on the street). But it seems that in the physical world we have choices. If you don't want to talk to someone you walk away. If you don't want to be somewhere, you leave. How does this translate to the virtual world?

One's immediate response is to say that it is easier to turn off in a virtual world, you do just that, turn off, log off, not participate at all. We can delete emails, sign out of Myspace and in the case of Stickam turn off our web cameras. But as this article (which I will discuss in more detail in a later post) states, there is an archive. We cannot run away, hide or deny that which we say and do online and this IS different. It is searchable. In the physical world, our actions, while they can be seen in by strangers, are confined in space and time to where they, archived only by physical memory. What we are in effect creating, therefore, seems to be urban-like environments with memory forever, crowds of strangers with an unbelievable ability to scrutinize. This article suggests that this might not necessarily be a bad ting. If we make everything public then maybe we do in fact become desensitized to it. Half naked pictures of 16 year old girls do start to become irrelevant when there are 6000 of them instead of 10. But the question I have, as I raised in class, is what effect does this have on our ability to exist and interact in the physical world? How will a generation that grows up interacting online negotiate physical space? There IS somewhere here a correlation. This does not mean that we should become paranoid and log-off. But there is a fundamental change in relationships when they primarily exist in a virtual space or when they are partly informed by a virtual existence. Some kind of disassociation occurs.

One of the assignments for next week’s thesis class was to discuss our project with someone who is completely out of our field. I chose my friend Craig, partly because he was unfortunate enough to be having dinner with me last night. We talked about a lot of things concerning online experiences and mobile phones. But the one interesting thing he mentioned, and I knew already that he did this, was his participation in T-Mobile chat rooms. I have personally never been in one or seen what they are, but apparently they are simple text based spaces where T-mobile users across the country can speak to each other. I asked him when he most used this and he told me it was primarily at home (which was odd in and of itself because one usually thinks of the mobile phone as enabling something mobile) and that he normally goes on when he can't sleep as a time waster. I asked him why he wouldn't do something like this online, IM or whatever. His response was interesting. He told me that online he feels more public, less anonymous and since this form of communicating is more for fun and to pass the time he doesn't personally feel invested enough in the communication to want to make it public.

It was at this point that I became very interested. Suddenly, it seems, being online no longer feels anonymous, even for someone like Craig whose exposure to online forms of communication is restricted to Myspace and search engines. It is interesting that in this environment his mobile phone has become a means to exert some personal control over private space. I'm still thinking about what this actually means…..

December 21, 2006

Embedding Privacy Paper

Here it is..finally.

Download

September 10, 2006

Privacy in an Online Context.....thoughts

As a result of Friday's conversation on 'What is Privacy?' in the first Embedding Privacy class, I began to think rather in depth about the actual definition and what it means to have one's privacy invaded in a world that is slowly obliterating the ability to keep certain forms of information private. There are certain things, such as our credit card numbers, social security numbers and maybe even our phone numbers and addresses that we consider to be private for obvious reasons. If someone were able to get a hold of this information they could use it to steal our identity or commit other crimes that could have negative consequences to our financial well-being. These are forms of information that, if stolen or discovered, most people would consider to be an invasion of their privacy.

But in an age that encourages public social communication, not simply with words and factual information about ourselves, but with pictures and video content, the concept of what kinds of information distribution constitute an invasion of privacy has changed. As I mentioned in class, privacy therefore can almost be seen as a function of context and perception, meaning that it has a direct relationship to the context of how information about ourselves is viewed and our perception of that information within its displayed context.

Continue reading "Privacy in an Online Context.....thoughts" »

September 09, 2006

Second Life Database Breached

I read this on TechCrunch. After an interesting discussion on Friday in my Embedding Privacy class about the definition and function of privacy in everyday life, I found it quite ironic that I discovered this while casually searchiing for other information. Apparently, the database that was breached did not contain consumer credit card information, although it did include unencripted passwords and addresses of users (which would be quite sensitive to many users who do not devuldge their real identies). Another interesting fact was that users were not notified of the breach even though they were required to change their passwords as a result. Interesting note (which I had not realized) the number of users on Second Life has doubled over the last month.

July 06, 2006

New SMS web widget causes concerns over privacy

According to a post on netvibes, Web based text messaging company txtDrop announced today a new widget for MySpace profiles and personal webpages that creates a button to deliver an SMS message to the page owner’s phone. The widget (this one doesn't work, so don't try it):


txtDrop.com

Although the service will mean free text messages to any US or Canadian phone for the sender, there are numerous privacy concerns about what txtDrop intends to do with a user's number and how secure the widget actually is in terms of protecting a user's mobile phone from spam. I visited the txtDrop website, and no where could I find a privacy policy or even background about the company, group or individual behind the service. MobileCrunch goes into further detail as to the many dangers that this particular service seems to have. The issues highlighted, which are actually quite bizzare, are that the service makes it possible for your friends to give your number to txtDROP without your consent, they provide no opt-out option and they make no attempt to prevent people with bad intentions from setting up the MySpace txt function using your number without your knowledge.The other issue, which I have found already exists within certain phone carriers who let you send messages from their websites is the potential of stalker-type anonymous messaging, since there is no way for the widget to know who the sender actually is.

This has the potential to be an interesting and popular application, especially for younger myspace users. But before it takes off I hope they address issues of how, not only to protect the user's information and privacy, but also how to ensure that the application is being used correctly and not with harmful intentions.

June 30, 2006

Pentagon monitoring social networking sites

Another article published early this month in the New Scientist that suggests that the NSA is monitoring people using online resources. This surprises me, or rather bothers me, much less then the article I previously blogged about concenring AT&T new privacy policy. It makes sense that the government would attempt to use people's information on various social networking sites to develop elaborate profiles. It may be completely ridiculous, but lets face it, the information is public so it was bound to happen. Perhaps this is an example of why it is important to be careful when posting information about yourself that is so easily accesible to anyone. (And an argument for providing anonimity protection for people who don't want to be identified with certain posted information on sites that communicate via media.)

June 07, 2006

The Implications of being Socially Public....rethinking anonimity

As I have aforementioned, I decided, after years of keeping my life somewhat private, to join a variety of 'social networking/media sharing' sites, partly because I saw the use and value in some of them and partly for research. As ideas and development for freeformed began to take shape, I thought it would be wise to use what others are using online to share media and communicate with people to see what was really valuable, what the implications were and what was wrong with the current models. After doing so, I have found a lot of things I like and a lot of things that I find strange and even somewhat scray. But I really began thinking about the implications of leading a public social life when I friend of mine, somewhat computer illiterate, called me and asked me to help him permanently delete his myspace profile. When I asked him why he was so determined to do this right then and there, he told me that he was tired of everyone knowing his business, people contacting him from years ago that he no longer wanted to speak to and getting strange friend requests from people he didn't know. He then said something interesting, he said he wanted to go back to being just him.

That statement as simple as it is maybe somewhat profound. Is it possible that in our rush to easily share our lives and network with others online, we have become something other then ourselves, that we have taken on new personas and let too much of our lives be public? I used to write rather frequently in a personal blog that a few of my friends would read from time to time. Then one day I woke up and realized that while I didn't mind these select people knowing my inner thoughts, it started to feel kind of strange that instead of speaking with me about the things that were going on in my life face to face or (in the case of my long distance friends) on the phone, they were reading about it online. It felt very disconnected and odd after a while. I'm not sure yet if I am going to stop writing in this blog completely, as I go through phases of being comfortable with sharing my personal ideas to being very private. But I think that after taking the plunge and putting myself everywhere, I am starting to feel the personal reprecussions.

In a strange twist, my friend so determined to cancel his myspace, just signed up for radar and uses flickr every so often. When I asked him what the difference was just to see his thoughts, he said that, especially radar, feels more private, that he can share his life with only a select few people and not be easily searchable by those he either doesn't know or doesn't want to know. Especially as it relates to developing freeformed, it seems that the concept of providing people with the possibility of anonimity is incredibly relevant for reasons far beyond the political implications in third world countries. I'm sure that not everyone feels like my friend, or even possibly like me, and not everyone has had bad experiences with being socially public. But at the same time, I am starting to believe that it is highly possible that a good number of people do not want to share with everyone, especially about certain things in their life. A cute picture of your dog may be irrelevant if you send it to flickr, but some things are not. The possibilities of being able to communicate with others you don't know about relevant topics using media and your own voice is endless and powerful, but, as I am now starting to realize, it can also be scary and weird. Food for thought.

May 22, 2006

Anonimity, Privacy and Mobile Posting

Lately, I have found myself thinking a lot about the questions surrounding the protection of identity online. Before six months ago my online pressence was almost non-existent because I was one of those people very wary of putting my personal information out there and quite disinterested in the concept of networking through online forums. It just wasn't part of who I was. Now, with flickr, my blog, my website (and yes, even myspace) who I am is readily available to anyone who cares. Its not so much that something inside me fundamentally changed or even that I became less nervous. I simply found myself realizing that there were advantages to this kind of indetification (in most cases) and couldn't resist participating. But just because the advantage of social communication is real, whether it be sharing photographs with your friends, taking about topics of interest to you or even screwing around on mysace, that does not mean that issues of protecting your identity are irrelevant, in fact they are probably more relevant then ever before.

The issue becomes compounded even further when you are no longer talking about protecting yourself or your children from online stalkers (although this is vitally important, as a mother and a sister to a twelve year old, and a stalk victim myself, I find the prospect of strangers being able to infultrate yours or a young child's life to be incredibly scary. However, the issue here may have more to do with technology education, which most schools in this country fail at miserably, perfering as with sex to advocate some form of abstinence rather then realizing that kids are going to do what they are going to regardless and that safety and protection should be the ultimate goals rather then blind ignorance). However, what may be the next step in this conversation is how do we take advantage of the amazing ability to create and communicate immediately and use it for purposes of knowledge and relevant conversation while still repsecting issues of privavcy and safety. I recently had conversations along these lines durring my meeting with members of witness.org.

Continue reading "Anonimity, Privacy and Mobile Posting" »