« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

February 27, 2007

New Orleans Trip

On March 12th, I will be joining twelve other ITP students and Shawn Van Every, Marianne Petit and former student Jeff Gray, to travel to New Orleans as part of the Digital Storytelling grant and collaboration with Xavier University. In preparation for this trip I have been talking to Yonatan Kelib, fellow freeformed collaborator and someone who is also doing his thesis in the realm of mobile phones and blogging, about possible implementations of projects using the phone. Many of the ideas discussed in the planning meeting of all of the participants today centered around the possibility digital video and audio, doing workshops on how to execute both and upload them to an online forum. Of course this is important. But I am much more interested in teaching things that don't require large amounts of teaching. Not because I think it is more important, but just that it could be readily available to anyone. Yonatan and I have discussed, in addition to the further user testing of the actual freeformed site, creating an entirely asterisk based system that would allow people to simply call a number a tell their story, with as much contextual information as they wish to leave. We plan to incorporate these messages into an open freeformed circle, no registration, no need to actually view anything online. The media files would also be posted to a blog that Yonatan will create for his research.. We hope that other people who join the online component of the site will then visit this circle, listen to the stories and apply their own pictures or video to them via media comments. I think it will be an interesting experiment.

Both of us of course intend to document as much as we can. I will be bringing my Nikon D80 for sure, as well as two mobile phones with different service plans. More about this as it gets closer....

Mobile Phone Coverage Maps for New Orleans

Cingular

cingular.jpg

Sprint

sprint.gif

Verizon

verizon.jpg

T-Mobile

Download PDF

February 26, 2007

Documentation of Xavier User Test

IMG_0014

IMG_0029

IMG_0018

Click on an image to view all....

February 22, 2007

T-Mobile Issues

Thanks to our user testing experience, we discovered that there are numerous problems with T-mobile these days that didn't exist last year when we released the first version. First, some T-mobile phones send a 1 in front of the number while others don't. Easy enough pattern matching problem to fix. (thanks Shawn). But now T-mobile also sends video as windows media instead of quicktime. BAD!

February 21, 2007

Some photos the Xavier Students took

397386847_3e6a636e2f.jpg

397386686_227aaf69d6.jpg

6467062513(7).jpeg

Documentation:

9144478799.jpeg

6464691985(2).jpeg

Multimedia message(34).jpeg


The Chaos Button

i was talking to Megan MacMurray yesterday about Alice Planas's thesis. She is trying to create sort of an anti-social network where people who either actively don't like each other or who don't know each other but who live in close proximity to each other. The idea is for people to be taken out of their comfort zone and be forced to communicate with people who may have different view points. Its an interesting idea.

Megan's reaction to the project as it relates to freeformed was the concept of a chaos button. Members could push it and immediately create a circle that contains users that live in their city but that they don't know.....or something along those lines.

February 20, 2007

Xavier Students

Yesterday, the students from Xavier University arrived in New York. Around 4pm, myself and the rest of the freeformed crew, met with them to discuss mobile technology, the freeformed site and take them for a tour of the immediate surroundings of NYU. Unfortunately, it was freezing outside and, despite their boots and jackets, I think we froze all of the students to death. The experience was quite interesting, however. Aside from needing moderate instruction on how to use the N80s (which I myself needed initially) they seemed to immediately be familiar with taking pictures with the phones and had no problem with the concept of using them as documentation of their trip. In fact, not once did I see any of them take out a camera of any other kind. But more interesting then that was hearing them speak. Initially, I had thought a lot of them would be from New Orleans, but most of them weren't (all of them were either from the West Coast or Texas with only two actually growing up in the city). However, they were all juniors and seniors so they had lived in the city, presumably, before the storm.

I was very hesitant to ask them any questions about what had happened and how it had effected their lives and education. But I soon found that I didn't have to. As they spoke about themselves, their interests and their school, the aftermath of the storm was evident. One girl, Ashley, who I spoke to extensively, is the producer of a morning radio show. She was telling us about how the two other local radio stations had become syndicated and many people in the community were very upset because they felt that their local voice was being taken away. She also told us about the destruction of the school's radio and tv station equipment and the loss of many computers during the storm and how most of it still had not been replaced because the school did not have enough insurance money to replace it.

I also spoke to their professors about the intentions of their art program and the ideas behind the possible collaboration between ITP and Xavier. Their program seems to be very opened ended, requiring the students to fulfill certain requirements yet allowing them to find their particular focus within their major. Xavier is apparently primarily known for very good pharmacy and biology departments and the art department in general is very small. This was even more curious as it made me wonder why these students, coming from very different cities, had chosen to be at Xavier. Not because there is something necessarily wrong with that at all. As Tom Igoe pointed out while all of us were having dinner, going to a university that is known for your intended major can be very difficult and create unnecessary pressure. But still this fact introduced an interesting dynamic. Their professors also indicated an interest in trying to expose the students to the powers of digital story telling. During their stay, they will be learning about digital audio and video recording and editing, podcasting, video blogging and various other technologies. This is all great. Yet, I couldn't help but smile when I saw how easy it was for them to communicate with their phones.

We will meeting with them again on Wednesday at 5pm. More on this to come.

February 16, 2007

Qoutes

Quote:

"I argue that we should be skeptics about the potential of cyberspace. Knowledge carried through the Internet is no less shaped by social forces than it is elsewhere. Far from delivering us into a high-tech Eden, in fact, cyberspace
itself is being rapidly colonized by the familiar workings of the market system. Across their breadth and depth, computer networks link with existing capitalism to massively broaden the effective reach of the marketplace. Indeed, the Internet comprises nothing less than the central production and control apparatus of an increasingly supranational market system."

The foregoing quote is from page xiv of the Introduction to the book entitled Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. The author is named Dan Schiller. The publisher is The MIT Press located in Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England. 1999 is the date of publication.

February 13, 2007

A Week of Asterisk

My mission over the last week has been to get the initial part of the asterisk side of freeformed up and running before the students from Xavier University get here next week. This has been quite challenging. ITP has been in the progress of migrating over to a dedicated asterisk server over the last month. This required an entirely new configuration of all aspects of the original freeformed code, including the changing and adding in new functionality. There were a few snags to do with unaccessible administrative functions, for which Shawn Van Every has been kind enough to help me with almost as soon as the problems arose. The freeformed asterisk configuration is now in a testing phase. Users next week will receive a phone call every time they upload a media file so they can leave a contextual description of their file (they can also turn this off on the fly). Users can also call in and leave comments on a particular circle.

Our initial thought was to set up a specific circle called 'Digital Storytelling; HOME' and then allow the students to create sub circles if they want to. We have also been asked to devise a walking plan, specifically illustrating where we will be taking the students. Since New Orleans has a very rich musical history our thought was to do research on musical history in New York City, specifically Greenwich Village and do a walking tour based on that information. More on this to come.

February 09, 2007

Some posts from the main blog

This

and

This

February 07, 2007

Other sites out there...the Link roll

Just an example of some of the sites I have tested or explored (the obvious and the obscure):

The Interesting/Best Ones (one * if they support mobile posting, ** if I like the site design):

http://www.clipsync.com/
Allows you to watch videos with friends and chat while the video is in progress. Also allows you to invite friends to video showings and rate videos.

*http://www.mozes.com/
**www.gumspots.com
Mobile phone based websites that allow you to share mobile content with friends. Mozes is more developed. Gumspots is a project by a former ITP student and potentially more interesting.

www.grouper.com
Allows you to comment a specific frame of video with your web camera. Flash player is very similar to one we were trying to develop. Its a little buggy though.

*www.eyespot.com
**www.jumpcut.com
www.motionbox.com
Online Video editing sites. Eyespot is probably the most interesting, although I like the Jumpcut website design better. Eyespot has a specific group for mobile video that is linked to CurrentTV. The best videos get selected to be voted on by current tv members for possible broadcast on actual television.

*www.blip.tv
Supports video bloggers. They've become considerably more commercial over the last six months.

www.dabble.com
del.icio.us for video

**www.radar.net
Supports photo and video uploads exclusively from mobile phones. Very private and unsearchable. You can only view the media of friends you have invited or who have invited you via email.

**www.flickr.com
My favorite media sharing site. We all know who they are.


The obvious:
www.myspace.com
www.facebook.com
www.youtube.com

And all the rest:
www.revver.com
www.clipshack.com
videos.google.com
www.bolt.com
www.dropshots.com
www.veoh.com
www.vimeo.com
www.vsocial.com
www.sharkle.com
www.streamload.com
vi.jebba.com
www.evideoshare.com
www.my5minutes.com
www.zippyvideos.com
www.vidilife.com
www.youare.tv
www.eatmail.tv
www.buzznet.com
www.videoegg.com
www.Ourmedia.org
www.Break.com
www.Tagworld.com
www.Metacafe.com
www.ebaumsworld.com
www.gorillamask.net
www.Dailymotion.com
www.blinkx.tv
www.firefoxflicks.com
www.phanfare.com
www.beedeo.com
www.ifilm.com
www.three.co.uk
www.putfile.com
www.4shared.com
www.badongo.com
video.yahoo.com
video.msn.com
www.joga.com
www.videobomb.com
www.snapfish.com
www.photobucket.com
www.pictureal.com

There are more.....

February 05, 2007

Initial Thesis Proposal

Here it is.. I am thankful to finally have been able to get cohesive thoughts down on paper in this form.

freeFormed front page redesign

Don't try to register or login...those won't work from this page. But here is the official re-dsign of the front page...thanks to Jadie Oh. A couple of things look a little weird on windows firefox but we are fixing it. That is the good part of having a PC person in the group.

February 03, 2007

Thoughts on First Experiment

I did a side by side comparison of camera phone and camera pictures from the experiment.

I was also struck by the similarities in the responses to how it felt to participate in this experiment. The responses brought up two interesting points, the idea that the camera phone is more suited for taking pictures that are meant to be shared rather then to be memorable and that photographing in a urban environment brings in to question the idea of private and public space and one's relationship to strangers.

Here are some interesting quotes from the previous post:

About the camera phone:

"the quality is not as important as the point getting across."

"there is something really enjoyable about taking
pictures with such a small and non-obstructive device."

"i feel like i'm documenting things around me to show other people or show online because camera phone has relatively low resolution, not enough for a photograph, so i feel that a picture taken by camera phone is a way to talk, prove, show people that i did this."

"I actually use my camera phone in stores a
lot, to get immediate feedback on something I'm thinking of buying.
I'll take a picture, e-mail it or send a mms to a friend, and then
call and ask them what they think"

"since (my camera) looks like a bigger deal, (make shutter sound and look serious), it's hard to take picture of people on the street."

"I think because with a cell you can forward things, store things on your phone, share photos much quicker and easier... You can't really hide behind a lens like with a regular camera, and everyone knows that your phone has the capabilities mentioned before so you kind of feel like an asshole invading their privacy. With a regular camera a person might think I'm a tourist or some kind of art student. There are different associations with both I guess. "


Urban Photography:

"Well in an urban environment you are aware of the privacy concerns
that you may encounter in taking pictures in a public setting"

"I'm always shy when I'm taking pictures on the street. I don't want to
be intrusive, so I am very conscious of when there are people in my
shot."

"well, it's very abstract concept photographing in urban environment. but i guess to summarize it's characteristics in a few words, it is and becomes more and more
instant
fast
easy
cheap
popularized/cellularized
uptrend
mobile"

.

February 02, 2007

First Experiment

Today, with the help of some very awesome volunteers, I executed my first experiment. We walked from school to the lower east and took pictures. I decided to put no restrictions on the methods in which the pictures were taken (there are no real restrictions in the real world). The only requirement was that everyone use their regular camera AND their camera phone. Here are all the results.

I then asked everyone to write me a short email addressing the following questions:

*Was there an observable difference in how you felt shooting with your camera and your phone and if so what was it?

Did you find that there was a difference in what you chose to shoot with each device? (ie was finding things to shoot with your phone more difficult/easier?)

Which device do you most use to take pictures when you are out with friends? walking around the city? onuuuijghj vacation?

Which set of pictures overall do you like more, the ones from your phone or the ones from your camera (or do you feel the same about both))?

If you didn't like the ones from your phone, do you think you would like them better if the phone had a better camera?

*How is photographing in an urban environment, specifically on the street, different then photographing in other situations?

Read on for the responses.

Lisa:

"My phone does a pretty poor job of taking pictures. It's only got a
1.3 megapixel lens, and I, and my subject, have to hold absolutely
still in order to get a picture that isn't blurry. Also, after about a
half hour of continuous use, the battery dies. That being said, I tend
to take a lot of pictures with it, because it is so small, and I
always have it on me. I also like it, because I can e-mail the photo
to someone immediately. I actually use my camera phone in stores a
lot, to get immediate feedback on something I'm thinking of buying.
I'll take a picture, e-mail it or send a mms to a friend, and then
call and ask them what they think. I also liked playing snagu a lot,
when it was first being beta tested.

My regular digital camera is pretty old. I am attached to it, because
it is one of the first "expensive" purchases I made with my own money,
and because it has a swivel lens for vanity shots, which is fun.
However, if the scene isn't flooded with light, the pictures tend to
come out very dark, making some of today's shots look like night time,
since it was so cloudy out. I tend never to bother packing my digital
camera when it is cloudy, at night, or if I'm going to primarily be
indoors. The camera also has an unfortunately loud and bright
stuttering flash, which is very intrusive, so I try not to use it when
there are strangers in my shot, because I don't want them to think I
am sneaking pictures of them.

I took approximately twice as many pictures with my regular camera
than with my camera phone. I also like the pictures I took with my
regular camera more, because they are clearer, and I was able to zoom
in and get closer details of things. It was also less time consuming
to get a clear shot with the regular camera because I didn't have to
keep so steady.

My main problem with my camera phone is that I can't zoom in, the
resolution is really low, so I could never make prints from them, and
they tend to always be blurry. When I borrowed Yonatan's phone for a
little while, I was pretty happy with the shots I got. I also borrowed
his digital camera for a while, and was amazed by the clarity and
sharpness of the shots. I may have to get myself a new camera pretty
soon. I have camera envy now.

I'm always shy when I'm taking pictures on the street. I don't want to
be intrusive, so I am very conscious of when there are people in my
shot. I'm also overly worried about whether someone will yell at me
for taking a picture of them or of their work. I get worried about
taking pictures of vendors on the street, or store windows. When I set
out to take photos, I tend to look for interesting objects. And since
my cameras aren't very good, I tend to try to get unusual shots rather
than pretty ones. I like taking pictures of the bicycles chained up to
things, especially the more decrepit ones. I also like finding
abandoned shoes. Although, the last time I saw abandoned shoes, I had
neither digital or camera phone on me."

Jadie:

" *Was there an observable difference in how you felt shooting with your camera and your phone and if so what was it?


Well, the main difference for me was that ( it has been a year and a half that I stopped using camera phone so i have to retrace my memory. anyways..) i feel more focused on taking pictures for myself when I use camera. On the contrary, i feel like i'm documenting things around me to show other people or show online because camera phone has relatively low resolution, not enough for a photograph, so i feel that a picture taken by camera phone is a way to talk, prove, show people that i did this.

Did you find that there was a difference in what you chose to shoot with each device? (ie was finding things to shoot with your phone more difficult/easier?)


camera phone's much easier to take pictures. first of all, it's small/easy to carry/always ready.
on the contrary, camera(especially when it's not a small camera), it's harder to get it ready, and since it looks like a bigger deal, (make shutter sound and look serious), it's hard to take picture of people on the street.

Which device do you most use to take pictures when you are out with friends? walking around the city? on vacation?


camera

Which set of pictures overall do you like more, the ones from your phone or the ones from your camera (or do you feel the same about both))?


camera : much more satisfying when i keep the pictures as my memory.

If you didn't like the ones from your phone, do you think you would like them better if the phone had a better camera?

*How is photographing in an urban environment, specifically on the street, different then photographing in other situations?


well, it's very abstract concept photographing in urban environment. but i guess to summarize it's characteristics in a few words, it is and becomes more and more
instant
fast
easy
cheap
popularized/cellularized
uptrend
mobile"


Megan:

" *Was there an observable difference in how you felt shooting with your camera and your phone and if so what was it?

I definatley took less time setting up the shot on my camera phone. and would only take it once, if it didnt look the way I wanted I would move on.

Did you find that there was a difference in what you chose to shoot with each device? (ie was finding things to shoot with your phone more difficult/easier?) Not really a dif in what I shot, but since i knew I had ny dig camera on me, I shot less on my camera phone, because of less quality

Which device do you most use to take pictures when you are out with friends? dig camera walking around the city? camera phone on vacation? dig camera

Which set of pictures overall do you like more, the ones from your phone or the ones from your camera (or do you feel the same about both))? Dig camera, although most times if I am taking a pic with my personal and something personal that I really think someone I know needs to see, not for personal pleasure (as in the dig camera) The camera phone seems to share specific experience with someone, the quality is not as important and the point getting across.

If you didn't like the ones from your phone, do you think you would like them better if the phone had a better camera? I think that it is just a dif use. I use the phone if I wee something really funny or unique that i want a freind to experience. Quality of the camera in the phone doesnt change that (just as long as the image can be made out)

*How is photographing in an urban environment, specifically on the street, different then photographing in other situations? I get more self conscious (especially on a busy street). Stopping standing to take a pic is so much more noticable on a busy street"

Yonatan:

"The difference for me between shooting with my camera instead of my
cell phone was quite interesting. At first I felt that my shooting
style was more natural with my camera because its sole purpose is to
take pictures and it has all the features that I use but as time when
by and my Pro 1 started to get heavy, I gave it to Lisa and was
happily snapping away pictures with my cell. True the screen size was
very small but there is something really enjoyable about taking
pictures with such a small and non-obstructive device.

I have found myself taking more and more pictures with my cell phone
because it's convenient form factor size and the fact that it's
basically a multifunctional product. I truly believe that
mult-function products will one day replace digital cameras and we are
already seeing them in the marketplace with the launch of the Iphone.

I actually like the pictures that I took with my camera phone for so
many reasons.

Well in an urban environment you are aware of the privacy concerns
that you may encounter in taking pictures in a public setting. This
will limit or influence what images you capture but in a more
different environment such as a national park or outside the close
confines of s city, you feel free to take any pictures you may like
without feeling like you are invading someones private space"

Nanna:

"*Was there an observable difference in how you felt shooting with your camera and your phone and if so what was it?

I spent more time trying to figure out how to align my shots with the camera. With the mobile I felt like I didn't have to necessarily care how I was aligning stuff. As a result I would get interesting outcomes. With the mobile phone I felt more like I was invading someones privacy then when shooting then with a regular camera for some reason. I think because with a cell you can forward things, store things on your phone, share photos much quicker and easier... You can't really hide behind a lens like with a regular camera, and everyone knows that your phone has the capabilities mentioned before so you kind of feel like an asshole invading their privacy. With a regular camera a person might think I'm a tourist or some kind of art student. There are different associations with both I guess.

Did you find that there was a difference in what you chose to shoot with each device? (ie was finding things to shoot with your phone more difficult/easier?)

Finding things to shoot with the phone was much easier. This was mainly because I had an easier time using the mobile then the actual camera. It was lighter to carry and quicker to take a picture with. Also not having to look into a viewfinder didn't make me stop for three hours...I'd just point, look at the screen, and shoot around.

Which device do you most use to take pictures when you are out with friends? walking around the city? on vacation?

When I'm out with my friends I always take my digital camera. If I am walking around the city and sightseeing I take my digital camera (this is because of the better quality photos). However, if I'm simply walking from one spot to another and notice something along the way I might take a photo of it with my mobile phone. I have taken pictures with my cell when I've been traveling, but this was because of the fact that I didn't have a digi camera on me... So I just used it as a replacement. I consider quality to judge when I'm taking photos - when I want better quality photos I use a digi camera (this is usually in the cases I really want to rmemeber something that happened, or a place) - when I dont care about quality (I either forget my digi camera or I notice something I feel a need to record) I use the mobile. Regardless, I've noticed myself trying to take more photos with the mobile.

Which set of pictures overall do you like more, the ones from your phone or the ones from your camera (or do you feel the same about both))?

I dont have a preference on which set I like most. I think that there are good photos and bad photos in both set. One might be better quality photos (the digital) but it doesn't make me like those photos any better. I think I would feel different though if I was trying to take photos of a place I haven't shot yet, or a spot I intend to remnisce about through my photos. Seeing that this was an experiment to record our surroundings, I am looking at all the photos individually to judge them.

If you didn't like the ones from your phone, do you think you would like them better if the phone had a better camera?

I might have liked some of the pics from my phone better if the phone had a better camera, but not necessarily all of them.

*How is photographing in an urban environment, specifically on the street, different then photographing in other situations?
If I'm out with my friends I'm taking photos to remember an event, and my photos comprise of pictures that were taken with the intent to make people look good. The subject matter of these pictures is the people, not the place. If I am out on the street, it depends what my motive is. If I am taking pictures of a foreign place, I tend to take standard photos of monuments that are as inclusive as possible (that is to say, I don't want to compensate missing a part of a monument in order to make it look artistic or take a good photo - i want to have the whole thing in my photo so that i remember it). If I am taking pictures in order to record an urban environment through photographs, my motives are different, and I guess I shoot and try and think about myself in that specific urban environment and how I fit in...In this case I don't care so much about content any more necessarily...Things can be chopped off, I don't have to be sure of where I took this shot, a building doesn't have to be whole. In these cases only, does the photography become more about the picture itself. In comparing how I take photos in public spaces vs. intimate settings, I would say that it also takes me a while to get used to shooting in public. In general it can take half an hour to an hour before I start taking photos in a bold sort of manner, especially in NYC. For some reason, it is extremely difficult to take a long time to absorb the specific thing you want to take photos of and examine what you want to do with it...I think this is because everyone in NYC is so used to walking around in a hurried manner without stopping for a second. "